Size DescriptionBeautiful edition of the original Dracula Bram Stoker classic interpretation. Since its publication in 1897, Dracula continues to readers with the depiction of a vampire with an insatiable thirst for blood to scare. Amazon. com ReviewDracula is one of the few books on horror by inclusion in the Norton Critical Edition series will be honored. (The others are Frankenstein, The Turn of the Screw, Heart of Darkness, The Picture of Dorian Gray, and metamorphosis.) The 100th Anniversary edition includes not only the authoritative text of the novel, complete with bright colors, but also four contextual essays, five reviews of the date of publication, five articles on dramatic and film variations, and seven extracts from literary and scientific criticism. Nina Auerbach of the University of Pennsylvania (author of “Our Vampires, Ourselves) and horror scholar David J. Skal (author of Hollywood Gothic,) are The Monster Show and Screams of Reason… More>>
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
Dracula is the worst book I have ever read, for the English course. It was so stupid and the movie was even dumber. Do not waste your time reading trash like this book. Rating: 1 / 5
OK, why this book is required reading for high school students? It is very long and I think Bram Stoker was German anyway that’s gotta get people confused. All are going backwards Sentance! It took 4 days to read numbers, my weekend of Thanksgiving full. Highschoolers So if you have a choice. . . do not read this book. Rating: 2 / 5
Is this just another version of Publisher Dracula Bram Stoker, it is (still a very exciting book in just a little confused mite). Well, there ya go. If you are in the secret of fascinating that you hook you gotta check this out to be. I’m so good, I should write reviews at Amazon and pay. Rating: 5 / 5
The main problems with this book is that Bram Stoker was a very good writer. What created it “” here is the first version of the popular a creature that has already been written about many times, even in his time. Bram Stoker vampire, probably because it is a story about a monster in real life, took the public imagination and the book is not on the back of a culture that is born is a large institution to sell “a bad history. This is only over those to inspire the interest of terror, especially vampires. Rating: 3 / 5
I have read many horror novels. It was not good at all. It began very interesting, and some parts are not bad. But all other things were scattered seemingly nothing to do with the novel and set myself to stop after 100 pages. I had to do a report on this book, and at the end of doing my report on Gaston Leroux’s Phantom of the Opera House, a wonderful story. I do not advise many read Dracula. Perhaps I’ve missed something completely in this story, it happens sometimes, but I thought it was terrible. Rating: 1 / 5